Stream Alternative

06 Leading Alternatives & Competitors To Getstream!

VickiiLast Seen: Jan 22, 2024 @ 9:54am 9JanUTC
Vickii
@Vickii

28th November 2023 | 23 Views
Milyin » 479382 » 06 Leading Alternatives & Competitors To Getstream!

Info: This Creation is monetized via ads and affiliate links. We may earn from promoting certain products in our Creations, or when you engage with various Ad Units.

How was this Creation created: We are a completely AI-free platform, all Creations are checked to make sure content is original, human-written, and plagiarism free.

Toggle

Meticulously seeking out in the market for some of the best competitors and alternatives to Stream (Getstream)? This blog is surely your one-stop spot as we have beautifully and carefully picked the 6 best stream chat API alternatives.

In the article below, we will also focus on the key features of each of the Stream.io alternatives, their pros, and drawbacks that would help you in choosing the right in-app chat SDK provider for your communication app. Without any delay, shall we start?

Top 6 Alternatives To GetStream

Below is a head-on-head comparison of some of the best Stream alternatives and competitors in the market – MirrorFly, Apphitect, Sendbird, Cometchat, Pusher, and Twilio, and their key highlights to help you make the right choice. 

Starting our list with the much-appreciated,

1. MirrorFly vs Getstream

MirrorFly is considered to be the #1 in-app communication SDK provider in the market over Getstream primarily because of its exquisite call and chat features, low-code components and libraries, 200+ tech experts to look after integration, and affordable pricing. 

Plus, web and app developers prefer MirrorFly over Getstream for its less than 20-minute integration, ultra-low latency levels, and two deployment models: self-hosted and cloud solutions that give the flexibility to build apps as per business needs. 

Key Features

  • Highly competent call and chat features

  • Dedicated cloud servers

  • Quick integration support

  • Custom pricing

  • Plug-and-play UI kits

Best USPs Of MirrorFly

  • 100% customizable video, voice, and chat SDKs

  • Helps build a White Labeled Solution

  • Gives complete ownership of API codes

  • Offers multi-tenancy support

  • Gives the flexibility to host apps on business’s servers

Use Cases: E-learning, Gaming, Digital Healthcare, Social, Dating, Logistics, Finance, Transportation, and more.

Tech Stack: Java, Kotlin, Swift, React JS, Javascript, Flutter, Angular

2. Apphitect vs Getstream

Apphitect is a go-to solution for web and app developers who are constantly seeking the best self-hosted in-app chat SDK provider in town. When compared with Getstream, which is known primarily for offering chat functionalities, Apphitect has a strong foothold on video, voice, and messaging capabilities with no limitations on scalability and performance.

Plus, when it comes to integration or migration, Apphitect makes the work easy-peasy at a budget-friendly dime. But one aspect that GetStream has and Apphitect doesn’t is the scalable activity feed services. 

Merits of Apphitect

  • Complete self-hosted solution

  • Offers 100% customizable SDKs

  • Ability to build white-labeled solutions with its SDKs

  • Gives complete ownership of their chat SDKs

Pitfalls of Apphitect

  • Absence of certain messaging features like activity feeds and polls

What’s Getstream best for?

Being a popular in-app SDK provider of chats, GetStream has niche messaging features like one-to-one and group chats, real-time message translation, offline messaging, read receipts, user-to-user blocking, ban users, and low-latency audio/video calling capabilities.

Plus, it tends to handle chat traffic better than any other providers along with the option to customize chats. 

3. Sendbird vs Getstream

Sendbird is one of the leading providers of in-app chat APIs whose feature suites like real-time message translation, one-to-one and group chats, push notifications, and presence indicators help boost customer engagement within the app and drive sales.

On the other hand, Getstream is predominantly known for its unique capabilities like news feeds, in-app messaging, and activity feeds in varied use cases like social engagement, healthcare, and more. 

And though both have profanity filters and chat moderation tools to handle spam flooding, getstream stands wise in latency related parameters, and in live streaming. 

Pros of Sendbird

1. Its rich feature suite that’s unlike any other provider and supports customization

2. Sendbirds SDKs offer detailed documentation to help developers in integration

Pitfalls of Sendbird

1. Developers found the pricing to be a little higher than its peers 

2. There are no much use cases to which it caters to

4. Cometchat vs Getstream

Cometchat is everything that a developer would need or want to build scalable and reliable in-app messaging, voice chats, and group video calls in minutes.  And they support the Flutter framework with unique engagement capabilities that come as an added advantage.

Plus, they come with data-masking or scanning features that help to scan for viruses before downloading them. 

While GetStream is completely powered by Edge network, one can find zero scalability limitations, 99.999% uptime, better performance, and unmatched reliability.

And in security and compliance parameters, Getstream stands taller than Cometchat, as it is GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, SOC2, AICPA SOC, ISO 27001. 

Pros of Cometchat

  • Cometchat caters their services to diversified use cases like healthcare, SaaS businesses, online education, sports, events, community, dating, and more.

  • Cometchat’s APIs are written in over 12 programming languages. 

Pitfalls of Cometchat

  • When compared with Stream, it does not provide AI text and image moderation features. 

5. Pusher vs Getstream

Like Stream, Pusher is also a PaaS platform that is known to provide 2 products:

Channels and Beams that help developers create a chat experience like Stream. 

While Stream uses APIs to bring in in-app chats to communication apps, Pusher gives you basic building blocks to tailor real-time chat experiences. Pusher also helps in integrating the data broadcast feature.  

Pros of Pusher

  • They offer a rich suite of libraries for frontend and backend frameworks and languages.

  • Pusher complies well with GDPR and HIPAA

Pitfalls of Pusher

  • Their main drawback is that it lacks some basic in-app messaging features and does not support integration too.

  • Pusher’s SDKs do not guarantee on-time message delivery. 

6. Twilio vs Getstream

While Twilio is a CPaaS and omnichannel messaging product, it renders APIs and SDKs to enable real-time chats, video, MMS, SMS, and email communications. 

Earlier, Twilio was known to offer programmable chat API but now as its successor came Twilio conversations API that has made it possible to add one-to-one and multiparty chat features to communication apps.

Pros of Twilio

  • Twilio complies with HIPAAm GDPR, SOC2, and ISO standards.

  • They have Hosted APIs that alleviate the stress to scale and maintain chat infrastructure.

Pitfalls of Twilio

  • Twilio has a limited feature suite, unlike Stream.

  • Increased latency due to the absence of multi-chat architecture

Top Alternatives Of Stream for Highly-regulated Enterprises!

Now when everything is said and done, you may find plenty of Stream alternatives in the article above that will aid you in integrating the best in-app chat API

But, when you look into Getstream alternatives for highly-regulated enterprises like healthcare and education where security is a concern, there MirrorFly stands tall. 

Because Stream uses AWS to store data where there is a risk of a data breach, MirrorFly gives businesses the flexibility to host apps on its servers or their premises and comes in full compliance with HIPAA and GDPR. 

And MirrorFly also uses E2E encryption mechanisms along with AES and other security mechanisms.

VickiiLast Seen: Jan 22, 2024 @ 9:54am 9JanUTC

Vickii

@Vickii

Following1
Followers0


You may also like

Leave a Reply