Images 7

Supreme Court’s Ayodhya Verdict of Ram Mandir Case


16th October 2023 | 423 Views

Info: This Creation is monetized via ads and affiliate links. We may earn from promoting certain products in our Creations, or when you engage with various Ad Units.

How was this Creation created: We are a completely AI-free platform, all Creations are checked to make sure content is original, human-written, and plagiarism free.


The seven decades old case of AYODHYA RAM MANDIR just got resolved. Supreme court passed its judgement today at 10:30am. Here are all the details you should know. The Ayodhya case of babri masjid-ram janambhoomi title just got solved by supreme court, where 5 judges of the constitutional bench headed by chief justice Ranjan Gogoi delivered the judgement. Images 7 In the final verdict, supreme court held the rights of RAM LALLA VAJRAMAN, the presiding diety of the disputed land. Supreme court announced that land of 2.77 acre belongs to RAM LALLA VAJRAMAN. The court also said that plea of sunni waqf board was maintainable. Supreme court ordered government to give a separate land of 5 acre to sunni waqf to construct a masjid. The land has to be allocated by centre within 3 weeks. Images 10 KEY POINTS: The 2.77 acre land is divided into two parts- the #inner courtyard where the #masjid stood still till 1992 and the #outer courtyard where the ram chabbotra and sita rasoi existed. The #supreme #court said that hindus were successful in proving their right over the #outer #courtyard but Muslims were unable to prove their #right on inner courtyard. Images 8 The #supreme #court held that while #records of British #period Muslim didn’t #abandon their claim on inner courtyard but the #hindus longing to worship under the central dome of masjid believing it to be #birthplace of LORD RAMA. Supreme court mentioned that it is #beyond its jurisdictions to say if Hindus are right or not but their point  was proven right and RAM WAS BORN UNDER THE CENTRAL DOME. It has been proven, the supreme court held that masjid was constructed by MIR BAQI on the #orders of BABAR. It was also proven that masjid was not built on a #vacant land , there was a NON-ISLAMIC #STRUCTURE on which it was built. On the above points it was proven that the LAND belongs TO RAM LALLA but the fact that Muslims were doing their Friday #prayers in the masjid since the #BRITISH PERIOD ALSO CANNOT BE REJECTED. Supreme court thereby ordered a 5 acre land to Muslims within 3 weeks so that they could build their masjid. The #disaster bacuse of which masjid was #destroyed also cannot be #overlooked. In my #opinion it was the right thing to do as their would be no dispute now and this incident will promote unity between the citizens. Supreme court and RAJAN GOGOI did the right thing and they resolved the conflict as well.

[Post url=""]

You may also like

Leave a Reply